Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County

Industrial and Community Development for Our Lamont County

| Home | In The News | Contact Us | Our Blog | Search this Website | Share

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN:

Industrial Heartland Expansion

Visible Air Pollution
IHE Main Page

Maxim's Deerland Peaking Station

Maxim Index
News on Maxim
Proposed Power Station at Deerland (North of Bruderheim)

NAOSC Upgrader
News on NAOSC
Proposed Bitumen-Upgrader Facility near Bruderheim

HAZCO

News on HAZCO
Proposed Waste-Sulphur-Storage and -Handling Facility
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Health-Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
   

Shell CCS Project
News and information on Shell's CCS Project

GENERAL

Table of Contents for Website of folc.ca
Site Map
Post comments on any items or issues on this web page or at folc.ca that concern you to the LCE Blog, the blog for folc.ca
Mail to FOLC or to folc.ca
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Glossary of Sulphur-related Terms used in the Petroleum Industry
Links
References - Bibliography
folc.ca Site Stats

You are visitor

at the website of folc.ca
since July 16, 2005



Click to get your own widget
 

 
 
 
 

Welcome!

Living in the Shadow of Industry

Hot topics:

There are three key pages at folc.ca that contain background information for becoming informed on sulphur issues and their impact on communities like ours.  These web pages summarize sulphur-related incidents and catastrophes (and related losses, injuries and deaths) throughout the world, from three different perspectives:

  1. Sulphur-Train Derailments;

  2. Evacuations, and

  3. Sulphur Fires.

This website is in support of FOLC (the Friends of Lamont County for Responsible Industrial and Community Development).  It is not owned and operated by FOLC,  it is not the official website of FOLC and does not necessarily reflect any official positions taken by FOLC on any industrial, commercial or residential development issues in the County of Lamont.
   The western boundary of Lamont County is located roughly 12 miles NE from the City of Fort Saskatchewan, in Alberta, Canada, and about 5 miles (soon to be one mile) downwind from the heavy-industrial plants located NE of Fort Saskatchewan in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta.
   Lamont County is predominantly agricultural but has begun to try to attract industry and is still hoping to attract industry like that which provided for the neighbouring Strathcona County a plentiful source of tax revenue, such as oil refineries, plastic and fertilizer producers, and oil-sands bitumen upgraders.

Highlights

bullet Visit LCE, the blog of folc.ca
bullet Table of Contents
bullet How to navigate this website
bullet About FOLC
bullet Directors
bullet Heating-Fuel-Cost-Comparison Calculator (Excel Spreadsheet; off-site)
bullet Mortgage and Loan Calculator (Excel Spreadheet; see also the Fox Business Mortgage Calculator
bullet Weather (off-site)

Issues of Concern

bullet The proposed Shell CO2 Capture and Storage Project
bullet The proposed NAOSC tar-sands-bitumen upgrader facility west of Bruderheim
bullet The proposed HAZCO sulphur-storage and -handling facility east of Bruderheim
 
 

Navigating this website

A combination of various methods can be used to navigate the folc.ca
website:

  1. The left navigation bar on this and on other pages of the folc.ca
    website;
  2. The table of contents on this page (as well as sub-indexes identified for some of the larger subject areas);
  3. The site map;
  4. The cross-linking from most of the folc.ca
    web pages to related pages at the folc.ca
    website and elsewhere on the Net (that is to provide a reading program for those inclined to explore the context of a given issue), and
  5. The search tools available at this website and on the Net.

About FOLC and folc.ca

FOLC is an association of Lamont County residents who are concerned about what the booming Alberta oil industry may bring for the health and well-being of their families, children, properties and environment.

FOLC is a not-for-profit organization whose volunteer members, with help and donations from Lamont County residents, monitor industrial and community developments affecting them and their neighbours.

FOLC is not opposed to industrial developments in Lamont County but will identify and oppose developments that pose threats to the wellbeing of the environment, health, society and finances of Lamont County, its residents, businesses and farms.

folc.ca is a website in support of FOLC (the Friends of Lamont County for Responsible Industrial and Community Development).  The folc.ca website is not owned and operated by FOLC, it is not the official website of FOLC and does not necessarily reflect any official positions taken by FOLC on any industrial, commercial or residential development issues in the County of Lamont.

The risk associated with attracting industry to our county is that Lamont County may evolve into the cesspool for Strathcona County's oil industry, into a place for storing, dumping or otherwise disposing of industrial wastes that are not wanted in Strathcona County or elsewhere. 

Those things can turn into extremely expensive and crushing liabilities for Lamont-County rate payers as time goes by and our children grow up.  We hope that we will leave our county to our children in better condition than that we were entrusted with. Some of the industry that is being invited to locate in our county may prevent us from doing that.

The owners of big industry (and even virtually all of the staff of our County Office) don't live here, our children, grandchildren and we do.


Table of Contents

Index for subject areas of Table of Contents

Details for subject areas

Air Pollution by the Industrial Heartland

Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
Flaring at Fort Saskatchewan07/31/2008
FOLC News05/31/2011
Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
Missing Air-Monitoring Data — FAP Response07/31/2008
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
Visible Air Pollution in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta and Vicinity07/31/2008

Alberta Government - Alberta Environment

News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant07/31/2008
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility07/31/2008
Notice of decision by Alberta Environment re: HAZCO's (in The Lamont Leader, Dec 6, 2005)07/31/2008
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?10/31/2008
What have you done to keep area residents informed about your proposal? 10/31/2008
What is your proposed schedule for approvals, construction and completion?10/31/2008

Alberta Government - Natural Resources Conservation Board

News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant07/31/2008
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility07/31/2008

 

Bitumen Upgrader

Bibliography07/31/2008
FOLC News05/31/2011
Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?10/31/2008
Index Page for HAZCO Issues07/31/2008
NAOSC bitumen upgrader07/31/2008
NAOSC's proposed oil-sand oil upgrader west of Bruderheim07/31/2008
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
Sulphur -- waste by-product of mining, oil-refining and energy production07/31/2008
Sulphur Fires03/25/2009
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards07/31/2008
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray07/31/2008
What do you do with the sulphur once it arrives?  How is it processed?10/31/2008

Contacting FOLC or folc.ca

Contact FOLC07/31/2008

Environmental Impact of Sulphur

Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC11/07/2007
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?10/31/2008
How willing would you be to live near this facility?10/31/2008
News Release 2006 04 21: Bruderheim Sulphur Plant07/31/2008
Notice of decision by Alberta Environment re: HAZCO's (in The Lamont Leader, Dec 6, 2005)07/31/2008
Opponents to your project claim that the technology you’re using to store the sulphur is new and untested?  What are you doing differently compared to more traditional sulphur storage facilities?10/31/2008
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary07/31/2008
Sulphur Fires03/25/2009
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?07/31/2008
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards07/31/2008
Sulphur: block-storage, processing and loading at Shell's Shantz Sulphur Facility01/30/2009
The flyer asks “Will our quality of life survive Hazco’s Sulphur Storage facility.  Its’ obvious some people are very concerned about your proposal.  What do you say to these folks?10/31/2008
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal07/31/2008
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?10/31/2008
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray07/31/2008
What assurances can you give residents that this technology will actually work, especially on the long term?10/31/2008
What exactly are you proposing to build?10/31/2008
What guarantees can you give that this project won’t have a negative impact on water quality, especially runoff?10/31/2008
What guarantees can you give that your project won’t have negative impact on air quality, especially dust and particulates?10/31/2008
What is your proposed schedule for approvals, construction and completion?10/31/2008
What would you do about the stink of burning sulphur?10/31/2008

Evacuations on account of sulphur-mishaps

Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
How willing would you be to live near this facility?10/31/2008
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary07/31/2008
Sulphur Fires03/25/2009
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards07/31/2008
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?10/31/2008
What assurances can you give residents that this technology will actually work, especially on the long term?10/31/2008

Health Impact of Sulphur

Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC11/07/2007
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?10/31/2008
How willing would you be to live near this facility?10/31/2008
Sulphur storage poses problems and environmental hazards07/31/2008
The flyer asks “Will our quality of life survive Hazco’s Sulphur Storage facility.  Its’ obvious some people are very concerned about your proposal.  What do you say to these folks?10/31/2008
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?10/31/2008
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray07/31/2008

Heavy Metals

Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
Sulphur -- waste by-product of mining, oil-refining and energy production07/31/2008

Industrial Heartland

Bibliography07/31/2008
Correspondence to and from County Office07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?10/31/2008
How significant will this project be to the local tax base?10/31/2008
How would you like it if you looked out your window and all you saw was a sulphur storage facility?10/31/2008
Industrial Heartland expansion in Lamont County -- Questions & Answers11/14/2008
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility07/31/2008
Proposal for a Cancerous Expansion of the Lamont-County-Portion of the Industrial Heartland05/30/2011
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008
The latest and archived news on HAZCO Sulphur 07/31/2008
Visible Air Pollution in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta and Vicinity07/31/2008

 

Links Page

Bibliography07/31/2008
Links Page07/31/2008

News, happenings, and events

Attempt at launching communications committee07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
Deerland Peaking Station, Bruderheim, Alberta07/31/2008
FOLC News05/31/2011
Index Page for HAZCO Issues07/31/2008
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008

Petroleum Coke

FOLC News05/31/2011
Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary07/31/2008
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray07/31/2008

Sulphur-Train Derailments

Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC11/07/2007
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary07/31/2008
Sulphur Fires03/25/2009
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?07/31/2008
Sulphur Train Derailments in Canada and the world11/01/2009
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
Unsold "Excess Sulphur" at Syncrude in Fort McMurray07/31/2008

Sulphur Fires

Alfred Loeffelmann's presentation to MPC11/07/2007
Evacuations of people due to sulphur fires or accidents with sulphur processing or transporting03/25/2009
How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire?10/31/2008
Petroleum Sulphur Glossary07/31/2008
Sulphur Fires03/25/2009
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008
Sulphur Train Derailments in Canada and the world11/01/2009
The Lamont County MPC Apr. 2006 HAZCO decision07/31/2008
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal07/31/2008
The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it won’t happen here?10/31/2008
What would you do about the stink of burning sulphur?10/31/2008

Sulphur Poisoning

HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
Sulphur Poisoning07/31/2008
Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?07/31/2008

Taxes

Comments on HAZCO's answers to its FAQs- Index Page07/31/2008
FOLC News05/31/2011
HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
Home Page of FOLC11/06/2010
How many people will be required to build the facility and how many of those will be local?10/31/2008
How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running?10/31/2008
How much will it cost?10/31/2008
How significant will this project be to the local tax base?10/31/2008
How will you deal with the safety issues with so much more road and rail traffic?10/31/2008
How would you like it if you looked out your window and all you saw was a sulphur storage facility?10/31/2008
Index Page for HAZCO Issues07/31/2008
NAOSC's Public Disclosure Document09/09/2008
News Release 2006 05 24: Report on the Lamont County SDAB hearing of HAZCO's request for an adjournment of the SDAB hearing regarding HAZCO's request for an appeal of the 2006 04 11 MPC's decision against HAZCO's application for a sulphur storage and handling facility07/31/2008
Proposal for a Cancerous Expansion of the Lamont-County-Portion of the Industrial Heartland05/30/2011
The flyer maintains that the storage facility is a waste of prime industrial land with very little tax return.  What’s your response to that?10/31/2008
The start of the opposition to HAZCO's proposal07/31/2008
What impact do you think your facility will have on attracting other industrial developments in the community? 10/31/2008
Why is this a good area to build your facility? What makes this better than somewhere more remote?10/31/2008

Weather

HAZCO's Nov. 17, 2005 Open House and Public Discussion Forum07/31/2008
Missing Air-Monitoring Data — FAP Response07/31/2008
Sulphur glut poses storage nightmare07/31/2008

__________________
Posted 2005 07 16
Updates:
2006 10 13 (reformated page)