Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County

Industrial and Community Development for Our Lamont County

| Home | In The News | Contact Us | Our Blog | Search this Website | Share

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN:

Industrial Heartland Expansion

Visible Air Pollution
IHE Main Page

Maxim's Deerland Peaking Station

Maxim Index
News on Maxim
Proposed Power Station at Deerland (North of Bruderheim)

NAOSC Upgrader
News on NAOSC
Proposed Bitumen-Upgrader Facility near Bruderheim

HAZCO

News on HAZCO
Proposed Waste-Sulphur-Storage and -Handling Facility
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Health-Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
   

Shell CCS Project
News and information on Shell's CCS Project

GENERAL

Table of Contents for Website of folc.ca
Site Map
Post comments on any items or issues on this web page or at folc.ca that concern you to the LCE Blog, the blog for folc.ca
Mail to FOLC or to folc.ca
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Glossary of Sulphur-related Terms used in the Petroleum Industry
Links
References - Bibliography
folc.ca Site Stats

You are visitor

at the website of folc.ca
since July 16, 2005



Click to get your own widget
 

 
 
 
 

Questions and Answers

Relating to the April 25, 2007 Land-Use Bylaw Meeting that presented a proposal for a cancerous expansion of the Lamont-County-portion of the Industrial Heartland

It appears that the County plans to re-zone approximately 38,000 acres just west and northwest from the Town of Lamont to Heavy Industrial Land (enlarging the Heartland).

Very Large Plants could locate in this area.  This would have an enormous impact on the area and may affect you.

— Allan Antoniuk
(in a flyer he had produced and distributed to County Residents at his own expense)


The following covers only a few of the question that were asked and of the answers that were provided.  The main reason for that is that not all of the questions that had been asked could be heard, let alone understood, by the vast majority of the audience. 
   The recreation centre is a very large room.  Many hundreds of people attended.  Although the meeting was to start at 7 pm, the process of signing in was so poorly laid out that by 7 pm the line-up of people wanting to sign in extended through the foyer, all the way to the front door of the rec. centre to the parking lot.  It took close to a half hour to permit all of the people in that line-up to sign in.  The Rec. Centre was filled to capacity, and for many of those arriving after 7 pm there was standing room only.
   No floor microphones had been provided, and the poor performance of the public address system made even the repetitions by Allan Harvey of the question from the floor and his answers to the questions somewhat unintelligible. 
   It must be hoped that a full transcript of all that was presented and stated that evening will be made available to the public.  (For details on some of the shortcomings of the 2007 04 25 Land-Use Bylaw Meeting and suggestions for how such problems can be prevented or overcome, refer to the e-mail message sent to Debbie Hamilton 2007 04 30.)

The County has been planning its land grab for many months, perhaps years, but we now have only a few days to formulate our responses and to file them with the County Office.  There is little time to get all the work done that needs to be done.  Therefore priorities need to be assigned, so that at least some of the required work will be done in the small amount of time that remains until the deadline.
   The details of the question-and-answer period will have to wait a little while longer to be expanded.  Check back here soon.

Questions and Answers

  1. Question: Why is the councilor for District #5, in whose district all of the heavy-industrial zone and its expansion would be located, not present here tonight?

    Answer: By Allan Harvey, partially unintelligible, but it consisted primarily of the reading of a letter by Ray Lopushinsky to the Lamont County Reeve and Council, dated April 24, 2007, re: his announcement that he excused himself from the discussions and decisions relating to the MDP and LUB documents [thereby leaving the residents and property owners in District 5 hanging high and dry without representation]. *
    (See copy of letter — 116kB JPG file)

* Ray Lopushinsky is in a conflict of interest situation because he is not only the councillor for District 5 but also serves on the board of directors of the Industrial Heartland Association.
   As of now Lamont County shelled out about $210,000 in membership fees to the Industrial Heartland Association but has received exactly nothing in return for that.  The Industrial Heartland Association brought no industry at all into Lamont County.

In response to Allan Harvey's reading of Ray Lopushinsky's letter, members of the audience requested that,

  1. Before we go any farther with the expansion of the Industrial Heartland, a by-election should be held to elect a replacement for the councillor who no longer effectively can represent the residents and ratepayers whom he was elected to represent, and that,
  2. Nothing should be done to promote the proposed expansion of the Industrial Heartland until after the October municipal elections have been held.

Back to Industrial-Heartland Expansion Main Page

________________

A democracy can only be made to work if its people stay alert and make sure that their representatives in governments at all levels do what the voters who voted them into office elected them to do.  That applies to all three levels of government: municipal, provincial and federal.

Who falls asleep in a democracy will wake up in a dictatorship.

— Otto Gritschneder,
(when asked why he wants to publicize the system of terror in German military justice under the Nazis — an estimated 50,000 death sentences had been pronounced by German military tribunals, and of those 20,000 had been executed during and right after the second world war)

The members of the Friends of Lamont County urge you to become involved in opposing the County Office's proposal for the expansion of the heavy-industrial zone.  If you have any suggestions for possible strategies or if you wish to actively participate in any way at all in forming an effective opposition, please .
   Just in case that no transcript of the meeting will be made available to the public, could those people who asked questions and received answers provide summaries of the questions they asked and of the answers they received?

Note: A few more photos will be placed on this page. More comments will be added [perhaps later today and] tomorrow to cover some of the question-and-answer period of the County-Office's presentation.

_______________
Posted 2007 04 28
Updates:
2007 04 28 (added quote from Otto Gritschneder and the following paragraph containing the appeal for input to be used in effective opposition of the County's proposed zoning change)
2007 05 05 (inserted explanation as to why why detailed comments on the Q&A period cannot be provided for a little while yet)
2007 05 11 (added Q&A #1 and link to copy of letter from R. Lopushinsky to Lamont County Reeve and Council)
2007 05 12 (added explanatory note to Q&A 1)