Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County

Industrial and Community Development for Our Lamont County

| Home | In The News | Contact Us | Our Blog | Search this Website | Share

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN:

Industrial Heartland Expansion

Visible Air Pollution
IHE Main Page

Maxim's Deerland Peaking Station

Maxim Index
News on Maxim
Proposed Power Station at Deerland (North of Bruderheim)

NAOSC Upgrader
News on NAOSC
Proposed Bitumen-Upgrader Facility near Bruderheim

HAZCO

News on HAZCO
Proposed Waste-Sulphur-Storage and -Handling Facility
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Health-Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
   

Shell CCS Project
News and information on Shell's CCS Project

GENERAL

Table of Contents for Website of folc.ca
Site Map
Post comments on any items or issues on this web page or at folc.ca that concern you to the LCE Blog, the blog for folc.ca
Mail to FOLC or to folc.ca
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Glossary of Sulphur-related Terms used in the Petroleum Industry
Links
References - Bibliography
folc.ca Site Stats

You are visitor

at the website of folc.ca
since July 16, 2005



Click to get your own widget
 

 
 
 
 

folc.ca's comment on HAZCO's answer to FAQ #35


Note: The background text in the following was copied from the Frequently-asked Questions page at HAZCO's website, Nov. 2, 2005.  HAZCO's answers to "frequently asked questions" deserve further comments.  Those comments are inserted where required in HAZCO's text and are shown on yellow background.

From HAZCO's FAQ web page (quoted verbatim):

FAQ #35. Why not build this facility at a more remote location, not so close to farms and communities?

Hazco was attracted to the area due to the availability of industrial land.  Since the land was zoned industrial, Hazco believed the site was a great fit due to the site characteristics, proximity to rail, highways and sulphur production sources.  



Comment:

That answer by HAZCO doesn't answer the question.  HAZCO should have come right out and stated, "We want it because we want it."

We know that HAZCO likes the location, and why it does so.  After all, HAZCO would quite literally get the use of the best industrial land in the County for a song and a dance.  The question was why the HAZCO site cannot be constructed somewhere else.

What HAZCO likes or does not like is not the proper criterion for having HAZCO locate its intended sulphur storage site here.  The deciding factor is whether HAZCO's site is good for the County of Lamont and its residents.  It isn't.  Therefore, what's keeping our County Council from putting its foot down?

Do the members of our County Council want to be re-elected? That is the question!

Other than that, HAZCO seems to think that the location of its choice — it truly is a choice location — belongs to HAZCO for the use intended, but that is not the case.  The land is zoned: Industrial — Discretionary Use. 

Now, we want our County Council to use the proper discretion and have them deal with a bad situation they permitted or perhaps asked to come about.

We want our Council to quit its fence-sitting.

Next FAQ

Back to index page to HAZCO's FAQs

Back to index page for Hazco sulphur storage site pages

Back to Bruderheim Main Page

Created Nov. 4, 2005