Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County

Industrial and Community Development for Our Lamont County

| Home | In The News | Contact Us | Our Blog | Search this Website | Share

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN:

Industrial Heartland Expansion

Visible Air Pollution
IHE Main Page

Maxim's Deerland Peaking Station

Maxim Index
News on Maxim
Proposed Power Station at Deerland (North of Bruderheim)

NAOSC Upgrader
News on NAOSC
Proposed Bitumen-Upgrader Facility near Bruderheim

HAZCO

News on HAZCO
Proposed Waste-Sulphur-Storage and -Handling Facility
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Health-Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
   

Shell CCS Project
News and information on Shell's CCS Project

GENERAL

Table of Contents for Website of folc.ca
Site Map
Post comments on any items or issues on this web page or at folc.ca that concern you to the LCE Blog, the blog for folc.ca
Mail to FOLC or to folc.ca
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Glossary of Sulphur-related Terms used in the Petroleum Industry
Links
References - Bibliography
folc.ca Site Stats

You are visitor

at the website of folc.ca
since July 16, 2005



Click to get your own widget


 

 
 
 
 

Sulphur: block-storage, processing and loading at Shell's Shantz Sulphur Facility


 


Weathering of sulphur block at Shell's Shantz sulphur facility

There are dangers at sulphur blocks that come not merely from pieces of sulphur falling off the block.  It can also happen that a sulphur block collapses, such as in a more sophisticated operation than that described in the caption of the next photo.  A sulphur block collapse occurred during the re-melting of a sulphur block on December 2, 2004 at the Ram River Gas Plant, where the Quinn Sulphur Handling Remelt Operations team experienced an incident with serious potential for personal injury. (Article; Block Collapse Photo)

 


More flaking at Shantz
In the background at the centre-right of the photo is a small gap in the massive sulphur block where a pay loader pushes sulphur into a sub-surface pit where it is melted for processing.

 


A sulphur-prilling machine in action

At the far end droplets of liquid sulphur are deposited on a moving, water-cooled stainless steel belt.  In the front the still warm but solidified droplets (prills) are dropped onto a conveyor belt that moves the prills into storage.
   At Shantz, about 40 machines like that in the photo above are in use, and the prills are stored, prior to loading them, in two silos with a capacity of 15,000 tonnes, each. 

 


Sulphur unit train being loaded

The prills are moved by gravity through a covered loading facility into unit-trains consisting each of a hundred or more open railroad cars.

At HAZCO's proposed facility for the Lamont County, initially about eight prilling machines would be operating.  The plans for HAZCO's facility indicate open conveyor belts that will deposit the prills in an open storage pile with a maximum capacity of 45,000 tonnes.  From there the prills would be loaded with a front-end loader onto an open conveyor belt into an open loading facility.
   HAZCO plans to avoid dust problems and conversion of sulphur through weathering (through the action of thiobacilli) into sulphuric acid that will contaminate the environment, by drenching its sulphur pile with a watery solution of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS). 
   SLS suppresses the action of  thiobacilli but is also toxic to aquatic life.  SLS is a known skin irritant.  Its effects are used as a standard of reference in control groups for tests intended to determine the severity of skin reactions to a variety of chemical substances ranging from cosmetic products to chemical warfare agents. Insufficient test data were found to permit drawing conclusions as to what effect specific levels or amounts of SLS will have on humans when ingested through contaminated drinking water, although material safety sheets for SLS state that SLS must not be ingested, as it will cause diarrhea and vomiting.
   Still, the EU standards for drinking water specify that SLS must not exceed 200 µg per liter of water.  That is a minuscule quantity of SLS, two ten-millionth of a gram.  It has not been identified by anyone what concentrations of SLS could be expected in the groundwater used by residents in the vicinity of the proposed HAZCO sulphur facility in Lamont County, nor does it appear that HAZCO plans to put into place anything that will prevent water contaminated with SLS to escape into the environment at its proposed sulphur storage and -handling facility for Lamont County
 


Sulphur car leaving loading facility

 


110-car sulphur unit-train leaving loading facility at Shantz
It takes about 6 hours to load one train.
HAZCO estimates that its facility proposed for the County of Lamont will be able to load such a train in about 12 hours.

Next Page: Sulphur prills render environmental pollution by sulphur harmless?

Back to index for Sulphur Blocks

Back to index page for HAZCO sulphur storage site pages

Back to Bruderheim Main Page

Posted March 12, 2006
Updates:
2006 03 17 (reformated this page to make it more printer-friendly, added information on environmental impact and other hazards posed by sulphur blocks, sulphur spills, sulphur processing sites, etc., and made various minor edits)
2006 03 21 (page broken up into five pages, to reduce required loading time)
2006 10 16 (reformated)
2009 01 30 (inserted reference to article and photo of sulphur block collapse)